Home Environment & Climate Change Environmental Risks International Community Fails to Take Collective Action in Reducing Carbon Emissions

International Community Fails to Take Collective Action in Reducing Carbon Emissions

11 min read
0
91

Reducing carbon emissions is of utmost importance in addressing the global climate crisis and achieving a sustainable future. Carbon emissions, primarily generated by the burning of fossil fuels, contribute significantly to the greenhouse effect and climate change. The accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere leads to rising temperatures, extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and ecological disruptions. By actively reducing carbon emissions, we can mitigate the impacts of climate change, protect vulnerable ecosystems, and safeguard human health and well-being. Transitioning to cleaner energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and adopting sustainable practices in sectors such as transportation, industry, and agriculture are crucial steps in curbing carbon emissions. Taking proactive measures to reduce carbon emissions is not only an environmental imperative but also an opportunity to drive innovation, create green jobs, and build a resilient and sustainable future for generations to come.

Embracing a holistic approach is vital when striving to reduce carbon emissions effectively. Carbon emissions result from a wide range of activities across sectors. To effectively tackle this global challenge, it is essential to consider the interrelationships and interdependencies between different sectors. A holistic approach recognizes that efforts in one area can have ripple effects on others and aims for integrated solutions that optimize carbon reduction across the board. By taking a holistic perspective, policymakers, businesses, and individuals can identify synergies and implement coordinated strategies that maximize emission reductions while minimizing unintended consequences. This approach allows for the development of comprehensive and sustainable solutions that encompass technological advancements, policy frameworks, behavioral changes, and the transition to cleaner energy sources. By addressing carbon emissions holistically, we can better navigate the complexities of the climate crisis and foster a more sustainable and resilient future for generations to come.

The cooperation of private companies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and states is, therefore, crucial in effectively reducing carbon emissions and addressing climate change. Private companies play a significant role as key contributors to carbon emissions, but they also possess the resources, expertise, and innovative capacity to drive sustainable solutions. By adopting environmentally conscious practices, investing in clean technologies, and implementing emission reduction strategies, companies can make substantial contributions to mitigating climate change. NGOs provide valuable advocacy, research, and awareness-raising efforts, holding both governments and private entities accountable for their environmental impact. Collaboration between private companies, NGOs, and states enables the sharing of knowledge, best practices, and resources, fostering a collective effort to combat climate change. Governments, as policy-makers, have the authority to set regulations, establish incentives, and create frameworks that incentivize emission reductions and support sustainable practices. Through a collaborative approach, these stakeholders can create a powerful alliance that drives systemic change, promotes sustainable development, and paves the way for a low-carbon future.

However, the biggest contributors to carbon emissions such as states and private companies are either not willing to take part in the collective response to climate change or they continuously fail in their reduction promises. One recent example of the companies’ unwillingness to reduce their emissions was the rejection of the new carbon emissions reduction targets for 2030 by the Shell shareholders, despite support from major pension funds and investors. The annual shareholder meeting of Shell in London was disrupted by climate protests. The protests, which have become common at annual meetings, focused on demanding an immediate end to fossil fuel production. Shell’s CEO, Wael Sawan, and Chair, Andrew Mackenzie, defended the company’s commitment to renewable energy, stating that they had invested in low-carbon energy but acknowledged that the majority of their capital spending still went towards oil and gas. Shell urged shareholders to vote against a climate resolution proposed by campaign group Follow This, which ultimately failed to pass. The founder of Follow This criticized shareholders aligning with company management, stating that it allowed Shell to contribute to climate breakdown. Sawan argued against cutting oil and gas production, suggesting that it would be premature and result in other fossil fuel producers filling the gap. The meeting was marked by disruptions, with protesters shouting and singing, and scuffles broke out as security removed them. Shell expressed respect for people’s right to express their views but criticized the lack of constructive engagement from the protesters.

Gas and oil companies acting upon their interests are not the only ones responsible for failing to meet the carbon emission reduction targets. The preliminary data from Germany’s environment agency (UBA) shows a slight reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in 2022. However, this is not sufficient to meet the country’s 2030 climate target. To reach the target, annual emissions reductions would need to triple from 2 percent in 2022 to 6 percent starting in 2023, according to UBA head Dirk Messner. The increase in coal use during the energy crisis caused by Russia’s war against Ukraine led to higher emissions in the energy sector, while high energy prices resulted in reduced emissions in the industry. The transport sector continues to be a challenge for German climate action, missing its annual target once again. The NGO NABU called on Chancellor Olaf Scholz to take action and push Transport Minister Volker Wissing to implement effective measures.

Taking a holistic approach is crucial when combating climate change as it recognizes the interconnectedness of various sectors and the need for comprehensive solutions. Climate change is a complex and multifaceted problem that transcends boundaries and affects multiple aspects of society, including energy, transportation, agriculture, and more. Addressing climate change requires integrated strategies that consider the interdependencies between these sectors and aim for synergistic outcomes. By adopting a holistic approach, policymakers, businesses, and individuals can better understand the systemic nature of the climate crisis and develop coordinated efforts that maximize efficiency and effectiveness. Such an approach ensures that actions taken in one area do not inadvertently exacerbate problems in another and promotes sustainable, long-term solutions that create positive environmental, social, and economic outcomes. By considering the interconnections and interdependencies between sectors, a holistic approach provides a more comprehensive and resilient framework for combating climate change and building a sustainable future.

By The European Institute for International Law and International Relations.

Check Also

Environmental Damage as a War Crime: Further Development in International Criminal Law? 

Background The environment and inflicting damage on the environment as a means or method o…